Moments ago a report by Foreign Correspondent ended and the particular subject of the report was Greece. Over all, while I think it’s mentioning of the word ‘Anarchist’ presented a chance for exposure to Australian audiences, the report, ironically enough, lack any explanation of what Anarchists stand for. Any discussion of the Anarchists was a discussion from a position of the old commenting on what amounts to a caricature of Anarchists as ‘rebellious youths’, which is the only impression you can get when you interview cops, a university professor, a teenage boy, a politician — practically anyone but someone who ascribes to the Anarchist ideology.
While I must give credit in the attempts of the reporter to give a description of what has happened in Greece since the shooting of Alexandros, somehow the report itself fell short and left me feeling angry. There was much discussion of the damage the Anarchists have caused in the riots since the end of last year, the street fights with police and much footage of the riots, giving the impression that this is what the Anarchists have to offer. There was no discussion of the ultra-nationalist efforts calling for racial purity and the ousting of immigrants, or the collaboration between ultra-nationalist groups and the Greek police. There was no mention of the defence Anarchists have given to immigrants that have sufferred attacks by these groups.
I think, however, the biggest critique I can offer of the coverage was in their explanation of the terrorist groups, Revolutionary Struggle, to which the foreign minister of Greece offerred this comment;
“I believe this is the worst fascist ideology. It has nothing to do with any values, it has nothing to do with any political thinking, it’s pure violence, so we are facing it again after November 17.”
The irony of it all is there is no distinction made in the report between Revolutionary Struggle, the group conducting all the bombings and murders, and the Anarchists on the street working in solidarity with immigrants. Revolutionary Struggle, from my information, operate on a militant Marxist-Leninst ideology which it has inherited from November 17. Unfortunately for the minister who seems to have her ideologies mixed up, this group ain’t fascist and unfortunately for the reporter, they ain’t Anarchist. Golden Dawn are the fascists along with the nationalistics in the Greek government and Revolutionary Struggle are Leninists. Yet the way in which the story was reported allowed Revolutionary Sturggle to bleed together with the mention of the Anarchists, never mind they each have a distinct set of ideas — chiefly that the Anarchists are not about to potentially blow up an entire block.
My last and final complaint is that the cover-up following the shooting of Alexandros was non-existent, instead merely confined to almost a footnote in the tale.
Although I suppose I may be mistaken as there is potential that future reports will elaborate more on the situation. Not to mention I doubt we can expect much more from the media — at least the term ‘self-described’ Anarchist didn’t appear.
PS: I’ll post the report at a later date so everyone and anyone can judge whether I’ve over-reacted or not. It’s not yet up on the Foreign Correspondent website.